Back to Publications
Process Engineering4 min read

Design, Sizing & Thermal Rating of a 100 KLD Multiple Effect Evaporator (MEE), VOC Stripper & Vacuum System for ZLD in Chemical & API Plants

Kiran SeepanaSeptember 15, 2026103 Views
Go VIP (Watermark-Free)
Executive Summary & Scope

Design, Sizing & Thermal Rating of a 100 KLD Multiple Effect Evaporator (MEE), VOC Stripper & Vacuum System for ZLD in Chemical & API Plants

Peer-Reviewed & PE Verified

ASME VIII • NFPA 68/69 • TEMA • ISO 9001 Alignment

This technical publication and associated design calculations have been reviewed for engineering consistency, unit integrity, and alignment with standard process design practices (Process Engineering).

# Design, Sizing & Thermal Rating of a 100 KLD Multiple Effect Evaporator (MEE), VOC Stripper & Vacuum System for ZLD in Chemical & API Plants

In active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing and specialty chemical synthesis plants, Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) trains must handle high-TDS wastewater containing volatile organic solvents. A conservative industrial plant design operates on a 20 Hours/Day Basis (100 KLD/20 h/day=5,000 kg/h100 \text{ KLD} / 20 \text{ h/day} = \mathbf{5,000 \text{ kg/h}} feed rate), reserving 4 hours daily for CIP acid/alkali washing, descaling, and decanting turnarounds.

This comprehensive technical guide details the mass-energy balance, 10% VOC Stripper surface condenser sizing, MEE vacuum pump & surface condenser rating, and Technoforce 40% TDS outlet hybrid topology for a 100 KLD (100,000 Liters/Day100,000 \text{ Liters/Day}) industrial ZLD facility.


100 KLD ZLD Process Train Flow Diagram with VOC Stripper Condenser, MEE Vacuum LRVP, and 40% ATFD Slurry Output
100 KLD ZLD Process Train Flow Diagram with VOC Stripper Condenser, MEE Vacuum LRVP, and 40% ATFD Slurry Output


# 1. Conservative Design Basis: 20 Hours/Day Operating Schedule

Industrial ZLD plants experience scaling by inorganic salts (CaSO4\text{CaSO}_4, Na2SO4\text{Na}_2\text{SO}_4, NaCl\text{NaCl}) and bio-fouling. Designing for 20 operating hours per day provides essential engineering margins:

Hourly Feed Rate F=100,000 kg/day20 hours/day=5,000 kg/h(5.00 m3/h)\text{Hourly Feed Rate } F = \frac{100,000 \text{ kg/day}}{20 \text{ hours/day}} = \mathbf{5,000 \text{ kg/h}} \quad (5.00 \text{ m}^3/\text{h})

# 1.1 Feed Effluent Composition Breakdown (5,000 kg/h)

  • Volatile Organic Solvents (VOCs): 10.0% w/w10.0\% \text{ w/w} (500 kg/h500 \text{ kg/h} Methanol, IPA, Acetone, Toluene).
  • Inorganic Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): 5.0% w/w5.0\% \text{ w/w} (250 kg/h250 \text{ kg/h} mixed sodium salts).
  • Water Content: 85.0% w/w85.0\% \text{ w/w} (4,250 kg/h4,250 \text{ kg/h} H2O\text{H}_2\text{O}).

# 2. Upstream Solvent Stripper Column & VOC Surface Condenser Sizing

# 2.1 Stripper Column Operating Parameters

To prevent volatile organic solvents from contaminating the MEE distillate (COD>5,000 ppm\text{COD} > 5,000 \text{ ppm}), feed is introduced into an atmospheric steam stripping column with Sulzer Mellapak 250Y structured packing:

  • Live Stripping Steam Rate: 0.125 kg steam / kg feed=625 kg/h0.125 \text{ kg steam / kg feed} = \mathbf{625 \text{ kg/h}} live steam (1.5 bar(g)1.5 \text{ bar(g)}).
  • Overhead Vapor Generation: 500 kg/h500 \text{ kg/h} VOCs +150 kg/h+ 150 \text{ kg/h} water vapor =650 kg/h= \mathbf{650 \text{ kg/h}} overhead vapor at 82.0∘C82.0^\circ\text{C}.
  • Stripped Bottoms Output to MEE: 4,500 kg/h\mathbf{4,500 \text{ kg/h}} (250 kg/h250 \text{ kg/h} TDS +4,250 kg/h+ 4,250 \text{ kg/h} water =5.56% TDS= 5.56\% \text{ TDS}, VOC <100 ppm< 100 \text{ ppm}).

# 2.2 Stripper Overhead Surface Condenser Sizing (Acond,stripA_{cond,strip})

The overhead VOC vapor is condensed in a dedicated tubular Stripper Surface Condenser:

  • Condensation Thermal Load (QstripQ_{strip}): 650 kg/h×900 kJ/kg/3,600=162.5 kW650 \text{ kg/h} \times 900 \text{ kJ/kg} / 3,600 = \mathbf{162.5 \text{ kW}}.
  • Cooling Water Flow (32∘C→37∘C32^\circ\text{C} \to 37^\circ\text{C}): 28.0 m3/h28.0 \text{ m}^3/\text{h}.
  • Logarithmic Mean Temp Difference (LMTD\text{LMTD}): 24.5∘C24.5^\circ\text{C}.
  • Overall U-Value: 0.85 kW/m2K0.85 \text{ kW/m}^2\text{K}.
Acond,strip=162.5 kW0.85⋅24.5=7.6 m2(SS316L tubes, 25.4mm OD)A_{cond,strip} = \frac{162.5 \text{ kW}}{0.85 \cdot 24.5} = \mathbf{7.6 \text{ m}^2} \quad (\text{SS316L tubes, 25.4mm OD})

# 3. MEE Mass Balance: 40% TDS Outlet to ATFD

Raw Feed (5,000 kg/h) ➔ [ VOC Stripper ] ➔ [ FFE-1 + TVR ] ➔ [ FFE-2 ] ➔ [ FCE-3 ] ➔ 40% Brine Slurry (625 kg/h) ➔ ATFD
 (10% VOC | 5% TDS)     (500 kg/h VOCs)    (1,240 kg/h H2O)  (1,285 kg/h)  (1,350 kg/h)  (250 kg/h Salt + 375 kg/h H2O)

# 3.1 Mass Balance Derivation for 40% Brine Slurry

MEE Feed Rate FMEE=4,500 kg/h(5.56% TDS)\text{MEE Feed Rate } F_{MEE} = 4,500 \text{ kg/h} \quad (5.56\% \text{ TDS})
Effect 3 Outlet Brine Slurry C40%=250 kg/h0.40=625 kg/h(40.0% w/w TDS)\text{Effect 3 Outlet Brine Slurry } C_{40\%} = \frac{250 \text{ kg/h}}{0.40} = \mathbf{625 \text{ kg/h}} \quad (40.0\% \text{ w/w TDS})
Water Evaporation in 3-Effect MEE Vtotal=4,500−625=3,875 kg/h(91.18% MEE Recovery)\text{Water Evaporation in 3-Effect MEE } V_{total} = 4,500 - 625 = \mathbf{3,875 \text{ kg/h}} \quad (91.18\% \text{ MEE Recovery})
ATFD Evaporation Duty VATFD=625−250=375 kg/h(Final Dry Salt Output =250 kg/h)\text{ATFD Evaporation Duty } V_{ATFD} = 625 - 250 = \mathbf{375 \text{ kg/h}} \quad (\text{Final Dry Salt Output } = 250 \text{ kg/h})
Total Recovered Plant Distillate =3,875+375=4,250 kg/h(100% Water Recovery)\text{Total Recovered Plant Distillate } = 3,875 + 375 = \mathbf{4,250 \text{ kg/h}} \quad (100\% \text{ Water Recovery})

# 4. MEE Vacuum System & Main MEE Surface Condenser Rating

# 4.1 Liquid Ring Vacuum Pump (LRVP) Specification

Effect 3 operates under deep vacuum to lower the boiling point of concentrated brine to 68.0∘C68.0^\circ\text{C} (Tsat=49.5∘CT_{sat} = 49.5^\circ\text{C} considering 18.5∘C18.5^\circ\text{C} BPE):

  • Operating Pressure: −0.88 bar(g)-0.88 \text{ bar(g)} (0.12 bar(a)0.12 \text{ bar(a)} absolute pressure / 90 mmHg90 \text{ mmHg}).
  • Vacuum Pump Package: 2-stage Liquid Ring Vacuum Pump (LRVP) with air ejector booster (15.0 kW15.0 \text{ kW} motor).

# 4.2 Main MEE Surface Condenser Sizing (Acond,MEEA_{cond,MEE})

Effect 3 vapor (1,350 kg/h1,350 \text{ kg/h} at 0.12 bar(a)0.12 \text{ bar(a)}) is condensed in a vertical shell-and-tube surface condenser:

  • Condenser Thermal Load (Qcond,MEEQ_{cond,MEE}): 1,350 kg/h×2,362 kJ/kg/3,600=885.8 kW1,350 \text{ kg/h} \times 2,362 \text{ kJ/kg} / 3,600 = \mathbf{885.8 \text{ kW}}.
  • Cooling Water Flow (32∘C→38∘C32^\circ\text{C} \to 38^\circ\text{C}): 127.0 m3/h127.0 \text{ m}^3/\text{h}.
  • Logarithmic Mean Temp Difference (LMTD\text{LMTD}): 14.5∘C14.5^\circ\text{C}.
  • Overall U-Value: 0.95 kW/m2K0.95 \text{ kW/m}^2\text{K}.
Acond,MEE=885.8 kW0.95⋅14.5=64.3 m2(SS316L tubes, 25.4mm OD)A_{cond,MEE} = \frac{885.8 \text{ kW}}{0.95 \cdot 14.5} = \mathbf{64.3 \text{ m}^2} \quad (\text{SS316L tubes, 25.4mm OD})

# 5. Complete Equipment Rating & Sizing Summary (20h Basis)

Equipment UnitOperating Duty / CapacityHeat Transfer Area / SizeKey Design Specification
Solvent Stripper Column5,000 kg/h5,000 \text{ kg/h} Feed (10% VOC10\% \text{ VOC})∅450 mm×6.0 m H\varnothing 450 \text{ mm} \times 6.0 \text{ m H}Sulzer Mellapak 250Y (Residual VOC <100 ppm< 100 \text{ ppm})
Stripper Surface Condenser162.5 kW162.5 \text{ kW} (500 kg/h500 \text{ kg/h} VOC)7.6 m27.6 \text{ m}^2SS316L Shell & Tube (28 m3/h28 \text{ m}^3/\text{h} cooling water)
Effect 1 (FFE-1 + TVR)1,240 kg/h1,240 \text{ kg/h} Evaporation23.1 m223.1 \text{ m}^2105∘C105^\circ\text{C}, 1.20 bar(a)1.20 \text{ bar(a)}, SS316L (6.0 m6.0 \text{ m} tubes)
Effect 2 (FFE-2)1,285 kg/h1,285 \text{ kg/h} Evaporation27.4 m227.4 \text{ m}^288∘C88^\circ\text{C}, 0.65 bar(a)0.65 \text{ bar(a)}, SS316L (6.0 m6.0 \text{ m} tubes)
Effect 3 (FCE-3)1,350 kg/h1,350 \text{ kg/h} Evaporation41.5 m241.5 \text{ m}^268∘C68^\circ\text{C}, 0.12 bar(a)0.12 \text{ bar(a)}, Titanium Gr. 2 (v=2.2 m/sv = 2.2 \text{ m/s})
MEE Surface Condenser885.8 kW885.8 \text{ kW} (1,350 kg/h1,350 \text{ kg/h} Vapor)64.3 m264.3 \text{ m}^2SS316L Shell & Tube (127 m3/h127 \text{ m}^3/\text{h} cooling water)
LRVP Vacuum Package−0.88 bar(g)-0.88 \text{ bar(g)} (0.12 bar(a)0.12 \text{ bar(a)})15.0 kW15.0 \text{ kW} Motor2-Stage Liquid Ring Vacuum Pump + Air Ejector
ATFD Dryer625 kg/h625 \text{ kg/h} Feed (40% TDS40\% \text{ TDS})12.5 m212.5 \text{ m}^2375 kg/h375 \text{ kg/h} Evaporation (250 kg/h250 \text{ kg/h} salt powder)

Process Safety & Engineering Publication Disclaimer
Terms of Service

This technical article is published strictly for educational, design modeling, and process engineering reference. Because chemical synthesis, solvent flammability envelopes, reaction calorimetry kinetics, and toxic off-gassing vary by plant configuration, all scale-up decisions, emergency relief sizing, and safety interlocks must comply with local statutory regulations (e.g., OSHA PSM 1910.119, PESO, ATEX/IECEx, NFPA) and undergo formal Process Hazard Analysis (PHA/HAZOP) prior to physical execution.

PharmaChemEng Technical Knowledgebase • www.pharmachemeng.com
Process EngineeringPharmaScale-Up
Comments (0)

Discussion

Please Log In to participate in the technical discussion.

No comments posted yet. Be the first to share your input!